•
5 min read
Adventures in Measure Theory - 5

I am following the Measure Theory series by D.H. Fremlin and blogging my notes here.

Continuing from where I left off last time,

111X (e)

Let XX be a set, A\mathcal A a family of subsets of XX, and Σ\Sigma the σ\sigma-algebra of subsets of XX generated by A\mathcal A. Suppose that YY is another set and ϕ:Y→X\phi:Y\to X a function. Show that {ϕ−1[E]:E∈Σ}\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\} is the σ\sigma-algebra of subsets of YY generated by {ϕ−1[A]:A∈A}\{\phi^{-1}[A]:A\in\mathcal A\}.

I have a confession to make. This problem had been troubling me for DAYS. It all came down to proving an equality and I was only able to prove one side of it. I eventually had to look up the solution and found one here on StackExchange. Before I start the proof however, there is an interesting comment on the selected answer that I would like to talk about here:

Nate Eldredge said,

The general trick is that if you want to show something (call it PP) holds for all sets AA in a σ\sigma-algebra σ(C)\sigma(\mathcal{C}) generated by a known collection, the obvious approach “let A∈σ(C)A \in \sigma(\mathcal{C}), show AA satisfies PP” is often not helpful, because you don’t know what AA might look like. Instead, try considering the collection B\mathcal{B} of all sets satisfying PP. If you can show that B\mathcal{B} is a σ\sigma-algebra containing C\mathcal{C}, you will be done.

One question I had immediately upon reading this was: Why will we be done if we can show that B\mathcal{B} is a σ\sigma-algebra containing C\mathcal{C}? Then I realised, that the σ\sigma-algebra generated by C\mathcal{C} is defined as the intersection of the set of all σ\sigma-algebras that contain C\mathcal{C}, i.e.,

σ(C)=⋂{Σ:Σ is a σ-algebra and C⊆Σ}\sigma(\mathcal{C}) = \bigcap\{\Sigma :\Sigma\text{ is a }\sigma\text{-algebra and }\mathcal{C}\subseteq\Sigma \}

which means that B\mathcal{B} is also a part of this intersection, and hence, every element of σ(C)\sigma(\mathcal{C}) must satisfy PP because every element of B\mathcal{B} satisfies PP.

I think this is a nice approach. Anyways, let’s get back to the proof,

Proof.
We want to show that {ϕ−1[E]:E∈Σ}\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\} is the σ\sigma-algebra of subsets of YY generated by {ϕ−1[A]:A∈A}\{\phi^{-1}[A]:A\in\mathcal A\}. Or in other words, {ϕ−1[E]:E∈Σ}\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\} equals ⋂T\bigcap T where

T={Ω:Ω is a σ-algebra of subsets of Y and {ϕ−1[A]:A∈A}⊆Ω}T = \{\Omega :\Omega\text{ is a }\sigma\text{-algebra of subsets of Y and }\{\phi^{-1}[A]:A\in\mathcal A\}\subseteq\Omega\}

First we will show that ⋂T⊆{ϕ−1[E]:E∈Σ}\bigcap T\subseteq\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\}.

  • In 111X (d) we proved that {ϕ−1[E]:E∈Σ}\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\} is a σ\sigma-algebra of subsets of YY (the domain of ϕ\phi).
  • A⊆Σ\mathcal A\subseteq\Sigma
      ⟹  {ϕ−1[A]:A∈A}⊆{ϕ−1[E]:E∈Σ}}\implies\{\phi^{-1}[A]:A\in\mathcal{A}\}\subseteq\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\}\}
      ⟹  {ϕ−1[E]:E∈Σ}∈T\implies\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\}\in T
      ⟹  ⋂T⊆{ϕ−1[E]:E∈Σ}\implies\bigcap T\subseteq\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\}

Now we will show that {ϕ−1[E]:E∈Σ}⊆⋂T\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\}\subseteq\bigcap T. For this we will use the new approach we read about above.

Let D\mathcal D be a family of subsets of XX such that for every DD in D\mathcal D we have, ϕ−1[D]∈⋂T\phi^{-1}[D]\in\bigcap T, i.e.,

D={D:D⊆X and ϕ−1[D]∈⋂T}\mathcal D = \{D: D\subseteq X \text{ and }\phi^{-1}[D]\in\bigcap T \}

Now,

(i) We know that ∅⊆X\emptyset\subseteq X and ϕ−1[∅]=∅∈⋂T\phi^{-1}[\emptyset]=\emptyset\in\bigcap T. Thus, ∅∈D\emptyset\in\mathcal D.

(ii) Let D∈DD\in\mathcal D. For every ϕ−1[D]∈⋂T\phi^{-1}[D]\in\bigcap T we have,

Y∖ϕ−1[D]∈⋂T  ⟹  ϕ−1[X∖D]∈⋂T\begin{aligned} Y\setminus\phi^{-1}[D] &\in\bigcap T \\ &\implies\phi^{-1}[X\setminus D] \in\bigcap T \end{aligned}

Also, it is obvious that X∖D⊆XX\setminus D\subseteq X. Thus, X∖D∈D  ∀  D∈DX\setminus D\in\mathcal D\,\,\forall\,\,D\in\mathcal D.

(iii) Let ⟨En⟩n∈N\langle E_n \rangle_{n\in\Bbb N} be a sequence of sets in D\mathcal D. Then ⟨ϕ−1[En]⟩n∈N∈⋂T\langle\phi^{-1}[E_n]\rangle_{n\in\Bbb N}\in\bigcap T. This means that,

⋃n∈Nϕ−1[En]∈⋂T  ⟹  ϕ−1[⋃n∈NEn]∈⋂T\begin{aligned} \bigcup_{n\in\Bbb N}\phi^{-1}[E_n] &\in\bigcap T \\ &\implies\phi^{-1}[\bigcup_{n\in\Bbb N}E_n] \in\bigcap T \end{aligned}

Also, ⋃n∈NEn⊆X\bigcup_{n\in\Bbb N}E_n\subseteq X. Thus, ⋃n∈NEn∈D\bigcup_{n\in\Bbb N}E_n\in\mathcal D.

From (i), (ii) and (iii) it is clear that D\mathcal D is a σ\sigma-algebra of subsets of XX.

(iv) From the definition of TT,

{ϕ−1[A]:A∈A}⊆⋂T  ⟹  A⊆D\begin{aligned} \{\phi^{-1}[A]:A\in\mathcal A\} &\subseteq\bigcap T \\ &\implies\mathcal A\subseteq\mathcal D \end{aligned}

Thus, DD is a σ\sigma-algebra of subsets of XX that contains A\mathcal A. This means that

Σ⊆D\Sigma\subseteq\mathcal D

and therefore from the definition of D\mathcal D,

ϕ−1[E]∈⋂T  ∀  E∈Σ  ⟹  {ϕ−1[E]:E∈Σ}⊆⋂T\begin{aligned} \phi^{-1}[E]\in\bigcap T\,\,\forall\,\, E &\in\Sigma \\ &\implies\{\phi^{-1}[E]: E\in\Sigma \} \subseteq\bigcap T \end{aligned}

We have thus proved both the sides, ⋂T⊆{ϕ−1[E]:E∈Σ}\bigcap T\subseteq\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\} and {ϕ−1[E]:E∈Σ}⊆⋂T\{\phi^{-1}[E]: E\in\Sigma \}\subseteq\bigcap T. Therefore,

{ϕ−1[E]:E∈Σ}=⋂T□\tag*{$\square$} \{\phi^{-1}[E]: E\in\Sigma \}=\bigcap T

Phew, that was one troublesome problem. If you have reached the end of this post, I commend your willpower. Let me know if there are any mistakes in my solution, or you know of a more elegant / easier / better proof for this problem. Drop an email at ricekot [at] gmail [dot] com.