6 min read
Adventures in Measure Theory - 1

Today, I will start studying measure theory. I will be reading through the Measure Theory series by D.H. Fremlin and blogging my notes here.

Let’s jump straight into it!

“The business of pure mathematics is to express and extend the logical capacity of the human mind, and … the actual theorems we work through are merely vehicles for the ideas.” ~ D.H. Fremlin

Measure Space

A set in which some (not, as a rule, all) subsets may be assigned a measure.

  • What is a measure?
    Although measure is just a number that is assigned to a set, it can be interpreted as anything that determines the size, amount or degree of something. Area, mass, volume, temperature are just some examples. In general, a measure may be interpreted as anything additive, i.e., the measure of the union of two disjoint sets must be equal to the sum of their individual measures.

When studying any measure, a proper understanding of the class of sets which it measures is necessary. This is where σ\sigma-algebras come in. All measures in the standard theory (there are non-standard theories too?!) are defined on such collections.

σ\sigma-algebra of sets

[111A] Definition. Let XX be a set. A σ\sigma-algebra of subsets of XX (a.k.a σ\sigma-field) is a family Σ\Sigma of subsets of XX such that
(i) Σ\emptyset\in\Sigma;
(ii) for every EΣE\in\Sigma, its complement XEX\setminus E in XX belongs to Σ\Sigma;
(iii) for every sequence EnnN\langle E_n\rangle_{n\in\Bbb N} in Σ\Sigma, its union nNEn\bigcup_{n\in\Bbb N}E_n belongs to Σ\Sigma.

It is also obvious that for any XX,

  • Σ={,X}\Sigma=\{\emptyset,X\} is the smallest σ\sigma-algebra of subsets of XX; and,
  • PX\mathcal{P}X, the power set of XX, is the largest σ\sigma-algebra of subsets of XX.

Elementary properties of σ\sigma-algebras

[111D] If Σ\Sigma is a σ\sigma-algebra of subsets of XX, then it has the following properties.

  • (a) EFΣE\cup F\in\Sigma for all EE, FΣF\in\Sigma.
    Proof. if EE, FΣF\in\Sigma, set E0=EE_0=E, En=FE_n=F for n1n\ge 1; then EnnN\langle E_n\rangle_{n\in\Bbb N} is a sequence in Σ\Sigma and EF=nNEnΣE\cup F=\bigcup_{n\in\Bbb N}E_n\in\Sigma.

  • (b) EFΣE\cap F\in\Sigma for all EE, FΣF\in\Sigma.
    Proof. By 111A (ii), XEX\setminus E and XFΣX\setminus F\in\Sigma;
    by (a), (XE)(XF)Σ(X\setminus E)\cup(X\setminus F)\in\Sigma;
    by (ii) again, X((XE)(XF))ΣX\setminus((X\setminus E)\cup(X\setminus F))\in\Sigma; but this is just EFE\cap F.

  • (c) EFΣE\setminus F\in\Sigma for all EE, FΣF\in\Sigma.
    Proof. By 111A (ii), XFΣX\setminus F\in\Sigma;
    by (b), E(XF)ΣE\cap(X\setminus F)\in\Sigma; but this is just EFE\setminus F.

  • (d) Now suppose that EnnN\langle E_n\rangle_{n\in\Bbb N} is a sequence in Σ\Sigma, then, following the same logic as (b), we have

nNEn=XnN(XEn)Σ\bigcap_{n\in\Bbb N}E_n = X\setminus\bigcup_{n\in\Bbb N}(X\setminus E_n) \in \Sigma

Countable Sets

A set KK is countable if there exists an injective function f:KNf: K \to\Bbb N.
Equivalent definition: A set KK is countable if either it is empty or there is a surjection from N\Bbb N onto KK.

If Σ\Sigma is a σ\sigma-algebra of sets and EkkK\langle E_k\rangle_{k\in K} is a family in Σ\Sigma indexed by KK, then kKEkΣ\bigcup_{k\in K}E_k\in\Sigma.

Proof. For if nkn:NKn\mapsto k_n:\Bbb N\to K is a surjection, then E_n=E_k_nΣnNE'\_n=E\_{k\_n}\in\Sigma\,\,\forall\,\, n\in\Bbb N, and _kKE_k=_nNE_nΣ\bigcup\_{k\in K}E\_k=\bigcup\_{n\in\Bbb N}E'\_n\in\Sigma. This leaves out the case K=K=\emptyset; but in this case the natural interpretation of _kKEk\bigcup\_{k\in K}E_k is

{x:k,xEk}\{x:\exists\,\, k\in \emptyset,\,x\in E_k\}

which is itself \emptyset, and therefore belongs to Σ\Sigma by clause (i) of 111A.

Some properties of countable sets

  • (i) If KK is countable and LKL \subseteq K then LL is countable.
    Proof. KK is countable, which means there exists an injective function f:KNf:K \to \Bbb N. Since LKL \subseteq K, ff is valid for all values in LL.

  • (ii) The Cartesian Product N×N\Bbb N \times \Bbb N is countable.
    Proof. Consider the function f(x,y)=2x3yf(x, y) = 2^x 3^y. This function is injective for all (x,y)N×N(x, y) \in \Bbb N \times \Bbb N [f(x1,y1)=f(x2,y2)    (x1,y1)=(x2,y2)][\because f(x_1, y_1) = f(x_2, y_2) \implies (x_1, y_1) = (x_2, y_2)].

  • (iii) If KK and LL are countable sets, then so is K×LK\times L.
    Proof. KK and LL are countable sets, which means there exist injective functions f:KNf:K\to\Bbb N and g:LNg:L\to\Bbb N. Consider a function h:K×LNh:K\times L \to\Bbb N such that h(k,l)=2f(k)3g(l)h(k,l)=2^{f(k)} 3^{g(l)}. Then hh is injective and hence K×LK\times L is a countable set.

  • (iv) If K1,K2,,KrK_1,K_2,\dots ,K_r are countable sets, so is K1×K2×KrK_1\times K_2\times\dots K_r.
    Proof. We will use induction on rr to prove this result.
    For r=1r=1, the statement is trivial.
    Assume that the statement holds for r=mr=m. If we are able to show that it also holds for r=m+1r=m+1, then by the principle of mathematical induction, it will hold for all rNr\in\Bbb N.
    We have, K1×K2×KmK_1\times K_2\times\dots K_m is a countable set. Let it be equal to MM. There exists an injective function f:MNf:M\to\Bbb N.
    When r=m+1r=m+1, it is given that K_m+1K\_{m+1} is a countable set, i.e., there exists an injective function g:K_m+1Ng:K\_{m+1} \to\Bbb N. Now, consider a function h:M×K_m+1Nh:M\times K\_{m+1}\to \Bbb N defined as h(x,y)=2f(x)3g(y)h(x, y) = 2^{f(x)} 3^{g(y)}. It can be easily verified that this function is injective. Thus, K_1×K_2×K_m+1K\_1\times K\_2\times\dots K\_{m+1} is a countable set.

Combining the idea of countable sets with 111D (d), we can say that,

  • If Σ\Sigma is a σ\sigma-algebra of sets, KK is a non-empty countable set, and E_k_kK\langle E\_k\rangle\_{k\in K} is a family in Σ\Sigma, then _kKE_k\bigcap\_{k\in K}E\_k belongs to Σ\Sigma.
    Proof. Since KK is a countable set, there exists a surjective function f:NKf:\Bbb N\to K. This means that, kKnkN\forall\,\,k\in K\,\,\exists\,\, n_k\in\Bbb N. Thus, kKEk=nNEnkΣ\bigcap_{k\in K}E_k = \bigcap_{n\in\Bbb N}E_{n_k} \in \Sigma.