4 min read
Adventures in Measure Theory - 5

I am following the Measure Theory series by D.H. Fremlin and blogging my notes here.

Continuing from where I left off last time,

111X (e)

Let XX be a set, A\mathcal A a family of subsets of XX, and Σ\Sigma the σ\sigma-algebra of subsets of XX generated by A\mathcal A. Suppose that YY is another set and ϕ:YX\phi:Y\to X a function. Show that {ϕ1[E]:EΣ}\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\} is the σ\sigma-algebra of subsets of YY generated by {ϕ1[A]:AA}\{\phi^{-1}[A]:A\in\mathcal A\}.

I have a confession to make. This problem had been troubling me for DAYS. It all came down to proving an equality and I was only able to prove one side of it. I eventually had to look up the solution and found one here on StackExchange. Before I start the proof however, there is an interesting comment on the selected answer that I would like to talk about here:

Nate Eldredge said,

The general trick is that if you want to show something (call it PP) holds for all sets AA in a σ\sigma-algebra σ(C)\sigma(\mathcal{C}) generated by a known collection, the obvious approach “let Aσ(C)A \in \sigma(\mathcal{C}), show AA satisfies PP” is often not helpful, because you don’t know what AA might look like. Instead, try considering the collection B\mathcal{B} of all sets satisfying PP. If you can show that B\mathcal{B} is a σ\sigma-algebra containing C\mathcal{C}, you will be done.

One question I had immediately upon reading this was: Why will we be done if we can show that B\mathcal{B} is a σ\sigma-algebra containing C\mathcal{C}? Then I realised, that the σ\sigma-algebra generated by C\mathcal{C} is defined as the intersection of the set of all σ\sigma-algebras that contain C\mathcal{C}, i.e.,

σ(C)={Σ:Σ is a σ-algebra and CΣ}\sigma(\mathcal{C}) = \bigcap\{\Sigma :\Sigma\text{ is a }\sigma\text{-algebra and }\mathcal{C}\subseteq\Sigma \}

which means that B\mathcal{B} is also a part of this intersection, and hence, every element of σ(C)\sigma(\mathcal{C}) must satisfy PP because every element of B\mathcal{B} satisfies PP.

I think this is a nice approach. Anyways, let’s get back to the proof,

Proof.
We want to show that {ϕ1[E]:EΣ}\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\} is the σ\sigma-algebra of subsets of YY generated by {ϕ1[A]:AA}\{\phi^{-1}[A]:A\in\mathcal A\}. Or in other words, {ϕ1[E]:EΣ}\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\} equals T\bigcap T where

T={Ω:Ω is a σ-algebra of subsets of Y and {ϕ1[A]:AA}Ω}T = \{\Omega :\Omega\text{ is a }\sigma\text{-algebra of subsets of Y and }\{\phi^{-1}[A]:A\in\mathcal A\}\subseteq\Omega\}

First we will show that T{ϕ1[E]:EΣ}\bigcap T\subseteq\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\}.

  • In 111X (d) we proved that {ϕ1[E]:EΣ}\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\} is a σ\sigma-algebra of subsets of YY (the domain of ϕ\phi).
  • AΣ\mathcal A\subseteq\Sigma
        {ϕ1[A]:AA}{ϕ1[E]:EΣ}}\implies\{\phi^{-1}[A]:A\in\mathcal{A}\}\subseteq\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\}\}
        {ϕ1[E]:EΣ}T\implies\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\}\in T
        T{ϕ1[E]:EΣ}\implies\bigcap T\subseteq\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\}

Now we will show that {ϕ1[E]:EΣ}T\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\}\subseteq\bigcap T. For this we will use the new approach we read about above.

Let D\mathcal D be a family of subsets of XX such that for every DD in D\mathcal D we have, ϕ1[D]T\phi^{-1}[D]\in\bigcap T, i.e.,

D={D:DX and ϕ1[D]T}\mathcal D = \{D: D\subseteq X \text{ and }\phi^{-1}[D]\in\bigcap T \}

Now,

(i) We know that X\emptyset\subseteq X and ϕ1[]=T\phi^{-1}[\emptyset]=\emptyset\in\bigcap T. Thus, D\emptyset\in\mathcal D.

(ii) Let DDD\in\mathcal D. For every ϕ1[D]T\phi^{-1}[D]\in\bigcap T we have,

Yϕ1[D]T    ϕ1[XD]TY\setminus\phi^{-1}[D]\in\bigcap T \\ \implies\phi^{-1}[X\setminus D]\in\bigcap T

Also, it is obvious that XDXX\setminus D\subseteq X. Thus, XDDDDX\setminus D\in\mathcal D\,\,\forall\,\,D\in\mathcal D.

(iii) Let EnnN\langle E_n \rangle_{n\in\Bbb N} be a sequence of sets in D\mathcal D. Then ϕ1[En]nNT\langle\phi^{-1}[E_n]\rangle_{n\in\Bbb N}\in\bigcap T. This means that,

nNϕ1[En]T    ϕ1[nNEn]T\bigcup_{n\in\Bbb N}\phi^{-1}[E_n]\in\bigcap T \\ \implies\phi^{-1}[\bigcup_{n\in\Bbb N}E_n]\in\bigcap T

Also, nNEnX\bigcup_{n\in\Bbb N}E_n\subseteq X. Thus, nNEnD\bigcup_{n\in\Bbb N}E_n\in\mathcal D.

From (i), (ii) and (iii) it is clear that D\mathcal D is a σ\sigma-algebra of subsets of XX.

(iv) From the definition of TT,

{ϕ1[A]:AA}T    AD\{\phi^{-1}[A]:A\in\mathcal A\}\subseteq\bigcap T \\ \implies\mathcal A\subseteq\mathcal D

Thus, DD is a σ\sigma-algebra of subsets of XX that contains A\mathcal A. This means that

ΣD\Sigma\subseteq\mathcal D

and therefore from the definition of D\mathcal D,

ϕ1[E]TEΣ    {ϕ1[E]:EΣ}T\phi^{-1}[E]\in\bigcap T\,\,\forall\,\, E\in\Sigma \\ \implies\{\phi^{-1}[E]: E\in\Sigma \}\subseteq\bigcap T

We have thus proved both the sides, T{ϕ1[E]:EΣ}\bigcap T\subseteq\{\phi^{-1}[E]:E\in\Sigma\} and {ϕ1[E]:EΣ}T\{\phi^{-1}[E]: E\in\Sigma \}\subseteq\bigcap T. Therefore,

{ϕ1[E]:EΣ}=T\tag*{$\square$} \{\phi^{-1}[E]: E\in\Sigma \}=\bigcap T

Phew, that was one troublesome problem. If you have reached the end of this post, I commend your willpower. Let me know if there are any mistakes in my solution, or you know of a more elegant / easier / better proof for this problem. Drop an email at ricekot [at] gmail [dot] com.